PAC/Eltonhead
From RoyalWeb
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
As recently as March 3 of this year, Richardson declined to state that the RPA version was incorrect. But apparently it wasn’t correct, because his newly published MCA gives a different sequence for the Stanleys of Hooton (which it seems is based on the research of Todd Whitesides, posted on SGM/Gen-Med earlier this year) | As recently as March 3 of this year, Richardson declined to state that the RPA version was incorrect. But apparently it wasn’t correct, because his newly published MCA gives a different sequence for the Stanleys of Hooton (which it seems is based on the research of Todd Whitesides, posted on SGM/Gen-Med earlier this year) | ||
| − | Contribution of John Higgins | + | Contribution of John Higgins originally posted to the [http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/GEN-MEDIEVAL/2005-07/1121390874 Gen-Medieval-L] list on Rootsweb July, 2005 |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
I think Richardson's restructuring of the Stanley of Hooton lineage is still weak on a couple of points. I can find no contemporary evidence for the Savage or Arderne marriages into this line | I think Richardson's restructuring of the Stanley of Hooton lineage is still weak on a couple of points. I can find no contemporary evidence for the Savage or Arderne marriages into this line | ||
Contribution of Todd Whitesides | Contribution of Todd Whitesides | ||
