Douglas Richardson, awaiting answers
From RoyalWeb
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
9.Will Johnson (2 November 2007) adds : A further correction on the death date of Sir Henry Curwen : Plantagenet Ancestry page 302 generation 17, | 9.Will Johnson (2 November 2007) adds : A further correction on the death date of Sir Henry Curwen : Plantagenet Ancestry page 302 generation 17, | ||
"Sir Henry Curwen died about 1553". However this from A2A showing Henry was yet living 18 April 1588: "FILE (no title) - ref. ID Cu/4/29 - date: 18 April 1588 (from Scrope and Content) Quitclaim by Nicholas Curwen of Stainburne esqr. to Sir Henry Curwen of Wirkington, his father, of all claims on his father's estate." | "Sir Henry Curwen died about 1553". However this from A2A showing Henry was yet living 18 April 1588: "FILE (no title) - ref. ID Cu/4/29 - date: 18 April 1588 (from Scrope and Content) Quitclaim by Nicholas Curwen of Stainburne esqr. to Sir Henry Curwen of Wirkington, his father, of all claims on his father's estate." | ||
| + | |||
| + | 10.John Briggs (11 November 2007) asked: "As it was the Court of the King's Bench, are you absolutely sure that the King himself was sitting on it?" At first Richardson replied: "Yes, I'm quite sure. The published account twice states that John Sparrowhawk was brought "before the king." | ||
| + | When told Richardson had misrepresented the situation, he removed his original reply from the Google archives, re-wrote his reply, incorporating information given to him, re-send it to gen-med pretending that this was what his opinion was, without acknowledging he had been wrong in the first place, nor acknowledged the person who had put his straight. When his deception was revealed, he abused one of the people what had revealed his action. | ||
