Douglas Richardson, awaiting answers
From RoyalWeb
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A page of questions that Douglas Richardson has yet to answer. | A page of questions that Douglas Richardson has yet to answer. | ||
| + | |||
| + | People who make public statements, when questioned usually will explain, justify or withdraw their original statement. Sadly, not so Douglas Richardson. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For several years Douglas Richardson has placed himself on a pedestal of superior knowledge of medieval genealogy and medieval Latin. This places responsibility on Richardson, the responsibility of being beyond question, as his reputation as a professional genealogist stands or falls with his actions. Too often he has ignored questions or remarks. | ||
| + | |||
| + | He has stated that he thinks people assessing Gen-Med "expect him to teach them". However not clearing up questions he has caused, can only create havoc and more questions. When can he be relied upon to provide acceptable information? Most of the time he does, but as a trained historian and genealogist he owes his "pedestal position" that he explains, justifies or withdraws his statements when questioned. Silence should not be an option for him. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is unproductive to keep asking the same questions on Gen-Med, therefore it seems better to create a collection of these questions to help Douglas Richardson remember what the outstanding questions, pending his answers, are. If we go to the archives of Gen-Med, no doubt, more unanswered questions can be found. | ||
1.As a supporter of crossposting, he has been asked how or if it has benefitted Gen-Med, can he advise what are the positive results. And does he still support it? | 1.As a supporter of crossposting, he has been asked how or if it has benefitted Gen-Med, can he advise what are the positive results. And does he still support it? | ||
